NDA@SZTAKI

Efficacy of anchoring the four-arm transvaginal mesh to the mid-urethra vs original surgery as a surgical correction for stress urine incontinence in coexisting anterior vaginal prolapse grades II and III: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Fekete, Zoltán

Surányi, Andrea

RĂ©nes, LĂłrand

Németh, Gábor

Kozinszky, Zoltán

2017

RG Gynecology and obstetrics / nőgyógyászat, szülészet

The prevalence of obesity with aging is escalating alarmingly;
and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence
(SUI) are now becoming a growing epidemic among the elderly.
Synthetic transvaginal mesh has been employed with increasing
popularity in the treatment of POP and is usually highly
effective in controlling the principal symptoms of prolapse.
However, studies have reported that mesh operations provide
fairly unfavorable SUI cure rates. Therefore, additional anti-
incontinence surgical strategies are increasingly being
scrutinized to achieve better postoperative continence without
any significant side-effects for patients with both POP and SUI.
We hypothesize that the modification with the fixing of the mesh
to the mid-urethra is superior to the original transvaginal mesh
operation (TVM) with regard to anti-incontinence.

angol

Article

PeerReviewed

info:eu-repo/semantics/article

text

http://real.mtak.hu/73631/1/13063_2017_Article_2314.pdf

Fekete, Zoltán and Surányi, Andrea and Rénes, Lórand and Németh, Gábor and Kozinszky, Zoltán (2017) Efficacy of anchoring the four-arm transvaginal mesh to the mid-urethra vs original surgery as a surgical correction for stress urine incontinence in coexisting anterior vaginal prolapse grades II and III: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. TRIALS, 18 (1). pp. 1-8. ISSN 1745-6215

http://real.mtak.hu/73631/

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2314-8

MTMT:3325972; doi:10.1186/s13063-017-2314-8.