NDA
Bejelentkezés
Kapcsolat
The diagnostic pitfalls of surveys: if you score positive on a test of addiction, you still have a good chance not to be addicted. A response to Billieux et al. 2015 |
Tartalom: | http://real.mtak.hu/28189/ |
---|---|
Archívum: | MTA Könyvtár |
Gyűjtemény: |
Status = In Press
Type = Article |
Cím: |
The diagnostic pitfalls of surveys: if you score positive on a test of addiction, you still have a good chance not to be addicted. A response to Billieux et al. 2015
|
Létrehozó: |
Maráz, Anikó
Király, Orsolya
Demetrovics, Zsolt
|
Dátum: |
2015
|
Téma: |
BF Psychology / lélektan
|
Tartalmi leírás: |
Background and aims: Survey-based studies often fail to take into account the predictive value of a test, in other words the probability of a person having (or not having) the disease when scoring positive (or negative) on the given screening test. Methods: We re-visited the theory and basic calculations of diagnostic accuracy. Results: In generally, the lower the prevalence the worse the predictive value is. When the disorder is relatively rare, a positive test finding is typically not useful in confirming its presence given the high proportion of false positive cases. For example, using the Compulsive Buying Scale (Faber & O'Guinn, 1992) three in four people classified as having compulsive buying disorder will in fact not have the disorder. Conclusions: Screening tests are limited to serve as an early detection ?gate? and only clinical (interview-based) studies are suitable to claim that a certain behaviour is truly ?pathological?.
|
Típus: |
Article
PeerReviewed
|
Formátum: |
text
|
Azonosító: |
Maráz, Anikó and Király, Orsolya and Demetrovics, Zsolt (2015) The diagnostic pitfalls of surveys: if you score positive on a test of addiction, you still have a good chance not to be addicted. A response to Billieux et al. 2015. Journal of Behavioral Addictions. ISSN 2062-5871 (In Press)
|
Kapcsolat: |